Know-What-You-Don't-Know Delegation Rule
Protect integrity by identifying skill gaps and assigning them to experts
- Difficulty
- Moderate
- Time to result
- ~weeks to results
- Steps
- 6
- Confidence
- 95%
The Know-What-You-Don't-Know Delegation Rule pairs integrity with accurate self-assessment. First define the capabilities a decision or function requires, then divide them honestly into what the leader knows and what the leader does not. A gap should trigger expert help rather than bluffing, personal control, or micromanagement. Kurt argues that nobody has every skill set and describes himself as Sawyer's visionary rather than its detail person. He delegates to talented staff who know what he does not, including a named successor and family members whose abilities earned roles in the company. The mechanism preserves decision quality while allowing the founder to focus on vision and continuity. Its output is clear ownership by qualified people, with the leader maintaining integrity and direction without claiming competence in every discipline.
Origin
Kurt offered the rule as core advice to entrepreneurs and later connected it to his own delegation, staff, and succession arrangements at Sawyer.
Core principles
- 01Integrity is not recoverable once surrendered
- 02No leader possesses every required skill
- 03Admitting a knowledge gap is safer than pretending competence
- 04Experts should own work the leader cannot manage well
- 05Delegation creates capacity for visionary leadership and succession
How to run it
- 1
Define the required capability
List the knowledge and skills needed to make the decision or run the function well. Anchor the assessment in the outcome, not the founder's title.
Pro tip Describe observable evidence that would prove competence.
Watch out An undefined role makes both self-assessment and hiring unreliable.
- 2
Map knowledge and gaps
State what you genuinely understand and what you do not. Include areas where familiarity is insufficient for responsible management.
Pro tip Ask where your decisions depend on untested assumptions.
Watch out Confidence is not evidence of skill.
- 3
Refuse to pretend
Protect integrity by admitting the gap instead of presenting an unsupported answer. Make the need for help explicit.
Pro tip Use direct language about the missing expertise.
Watch out Pretended knowledge can compromise both trust and the decision.
- 4
Find the missing expert
Recruit or consult someone whose demonstrated skill matches the gap. Judge fit by capability and evidence rather than convenience.
Pro tip Look for people who can explain both their decision and its trade-offs.
Watch out Delegating to an available person without the required skill only moves the gap.
- 5
Delegate real ownership
Give the qualified person room to manage the work while keeping goals and accountability clear. Avoid directing details you do not understand.
Pro tip Set outcomes and review points rather than prescribing every action.
Watch out Micromanaging outside your expertise overrides the value of hiring the expert.
- 6
Build continuity
Extend delegation into succession so the organisation does not depend on one founder's continued control. Keep the visionary role distinct from detailed execution.
Pro tip Name and prepare successors before the transition becomes urgent.
Watch out Informal dependence on talented staff is not the same as a succession plan.
In the wild
Kurt describes himself as Sawyer's visionary rather than its detail person. He says he has named a successor and delegates to talented staff, including a daughter who runs the foundation, another who handles social media, and sons-in-law whose abilities led to company roles.
→ The company can sustain its operations and mission without Kurt personally managing every discipline.
Common mistakes
Pretending to know
Claiming expertise where it is absent weakens both integrity and decision quality.
Managing every function
No founder has every skill set, so attempting to control all disciplines creates avoidable blind spots.
Delegating without ownership
Hiring expertise while continuing to micromanage its details prevents the expert from supplying the missing capability.
Is it for you?
Best for
It is best for founders moving from personal execution into a capable leadership team and eventual succession.
Not ideal for
It is not ideal when the leader has not defined the required outcome or cannot provide accountable ownership to the delegate.
From the transcript
“One, never lose your integrity. you don't get that back.”
“Secondly, know what you know and know what you don't know. And don't pretend you know what you don't know.”
“Don't don't try to micromanage something you don't have the skill sets for.”
From the episode
Turn Trash Water into Drinking Water ft. Kurt Avery
Kurt Avery